Essay --

1.On April 22, 2013 a jury trial was planned for commence as the result of Timelines, Inc. suing Facebook, Inc. for authentication infringement. Timelines, Inc. filed with the courts after noticing that Facebook, Inc. added the new Timeline feature to its outgrowth profiles. Facebook motioned for a compendious judgment, but the U.S. District Court for Northern District of Illinois turned down Facebooks motion for a summary judgment. The reason they denied this motion is because Facebook failed to uprise that the intelligence operation timeline was of fair use, and that the term timelines was just a generic term. A party that moves for a summary judgment is trying to save the time and depreciate of a full trial when the outcome is usually obvious. Since Timelines, Inc. has a registered earmark of the timelines phrase the court affirmed that they were entitled to a presumption of validity. If I were a member of the jury, I would rule in favor of Timelines, Inc. because Facebook went against the trademark laws, and was not able to prove that the phrase timeline was of fair use. Fair use can be proven only if the defense can prove that such use was for a purpose other than that normally made of a trademark. The party that is beingness supercharged with trademark infringement may defeat proceedings ONLY if it can prove a valid exception of fair use. If companies did not trademark their mark, aggregate companies would use similar marks causing consumer confusion about the origin of the defendants goods/services. As much as I relish Facebook, I feel as though they took someone elses creation, and used their power to make the concept legendary. Trademark infringement is a violation of the scoop shovel rights abandoned to a trademark without the authorization of the tra... ... the duplication of the right of first publicationed work must be outside the exceptions. The combination, the lyrics and associated melodies, intonations, and usage are too similar t o the original. This violates the copyright trademark laws, and it is protectable material. The puzzle pieces match knowing that the composers advisors, John and Charles, listened to her song in 2008, critiqued it, and told her it was best as a duet. Copyright infringement is the act of violating each of a copyright owners exclusive rights that were granted by the Federal Copyright Act. The only exceptions to the copyright law are fair use, face to face instruction, and virtual(prenominal) instruction. These exceptions allow someone to use work without permission from the copyright holder, and potentially paying fees. If Bowen wins the case, she could potentially receive the actual dollar amount of the profits. seek -- 1.On April 22, 2013 a jury trial was planned for commence as the result of Timelines, Inc. suing Facebook, Inc. for trademark infringement. Timelines, Inc. filed with the courts after noticing that Facebook, Inc. added the new Timeline feature to i ts member profiles. Facebook motioned for a summary judgment, but the U.S. District Court for Northern District of Illinois turned down Facebooks motion for a summary judgment. The reason they denied this motion is because Facebook failed to prove that the word timeline was of fair use, and that the term timelines was just a generic term. A party that moves for a summary judgment is trying to save the time and expense of a full trial when the outcome is usually obvious. Since Timelines, Inc. has a registered trademark of the timelines phrase the court affirmed that they were entitled to a presumption of validity. If I were a member of the jury, I would rule in favor of Timelines, Inc. because Facebook went against the trademark laws, and was not able to prove that the phrase timeline was of fair use. Fair use can be proved only if the defense can prove that such use was for a purpose other than that normally made of a trademark. The party that is being charged with trademark infring ement may defeat proceedings ONLY if it can prove a valid exception of fair use. If companies did not trademark their mark, multiple companies would use similar marks causing consumer confusion about the origin of the defendants goods/services. As much as I love Facebook, I feel as though they took someone elses creation, and used their power to make the concept legendary. Trademark infringement is a violation of the exclusive rights attached to a trademark without the authorization of the tra... ... the duplication of the copyrighted work must be outside the exceptions. The combination, the lyrics and associated melodies, intonations, and usage are too similar to the original. This violates the copyright trademark laws, and it is protectable material. The puzzle pieces match knowing that the composers advisors, John and Charles, listened to her song in 2008, critiqued it, and told her it was best as a duet. Copyright infringement is the act of violating any of a copyright owners e xclusive rights that were granted by the Federal Copyright Act. The only exceptions to the copyright law are fair use, face-to-face instruction, and virtual instruction. These exceptions allow someone to use work without permission from the copyright holder, and potentially paying fees. If Bowen wins the case, she could potentially receive the actual dollar amount of the profits.